Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35254 (JHR)

VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6025/2025 · 2025-10-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32027 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6025 of 2025 Vipin Kumar, aged about 32 years, Son of Shri Vijay Kumar, Resident of-Qtr. No. 1B/213, Kathara 4 No., P.O.-Kathara, P.S.-Gomia, District- Bokaro. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Nandan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate ------ 2/15.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, pending learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in urgent need of money for the marriage of the sister and in view of that he has taken a sum of Rupees six lakhs and subsequently Rupees One lakhs at the interest rate of 2% per month and in view of that the petitioner is paying a sum of Rs.14,000/- per month to the informant. He further submits that the petitioner was already paying the interest amount and also the principal amount of Rs.4,50,000/- has already been returned. However, the informant tries to grab the land of the petitioner. He further submits that for recovery of the due amount, the present FIR has been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that it appears that for the said allegation, the FIR has been lodged. 2025:JHHC:32027 2 Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer and submits that the amount has not been returned to the informant. 5. In view of the above and considering that the petitioner has taken the said amount at the interest rate of 2% per month and he is also paying Rs.14,000/- per month to the informant. It has been pointed out that Rs.4,50,000/- has been returned by the petitioner of the principal amount and subsequently the informant sought to take the land of the petitioner. It has further been pointed out that the petitioner has appeared before the investigating officer and pointed out all these things, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 15.10.2025 R.Kumar