2025:JHHC:32045 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.6274 of 2024 ---- 1. Md. Samsuddin @ Samsuddin Ansari @ Samsuddin, aged about 58 years, son of Noor Mohammad, Resident of Village Kesda, Tati Jharia, P.O. Tati Jharia, P.S. Bishnugarh, District Hazaribag. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, having its registered office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand; 2. Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag having its at Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag. 3. Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag having its at Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag 4. Circle Officer, Tati Jharia, having its office at Tati Jharia, P.O. P.O. Tati Jharia, P.S. Bishnugarh, District Hazaribag; 5. Circle Inspector, Tati Jharia, having its office at Tati Jharia, P.O. P.O. Tati Jharia, P.S. Bishnugarh, District Hazaribag; 6. Gulam Mushtafa, son of Late Samir Mian; 7. Md. Gulzar, son of Late Immamudin @ Imaman Mian; Respondent No. 6 and 7 are residents of Village Kesda, Tati Jharia, P.O. Tati Jharia, P.S. Bishnugarh, District Hazaribag. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pratik Sen, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, G.A.-V ---- 10/Dated: 15th October, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “ (a) In the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 09.09.2024 passed in Case No. 04/2024-2025 (Annexure-4) by the Circle Officer, Tati Jharia, whereby the application dated 15.06.2024, filed by the petitioner for demarcation of land situated at Village (Mouza)-Kesra, Khata No. 07, Plot No. 1759, Halka No. 3, Thana No. 170, Area 07 decimal under the District of Hazaribag surrounded by in the East-land of Roshan Mian, West-Road, North-land of Samir Mian and South land of Samir Mian; 2025:JHHC:32045 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.6274 of 2024 (b) Upon quashing the aforesaid order dated 09.09.2024 passed in Case No. 04/2024-2025 by the Circle Officer, Tati Jharia be further pleased to direct the concern respondent authorities to forthwith carry out the demarcation of the land in question in favour of the petitioner;” 2. Since the dispute raised in the present writ petition can be resolved only by the Civil Court as there is private dispute between the parties. 3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the other side has no objection. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the parties clarifying that the impugned order will carry no meaning, so far as the right and liability of the parties are concerned. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 15th October, 2025 Amar-Rashmi/- Uploaded