KHUSHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
CRM-M/15131/2025 · 2025-07-21
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35249 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35249 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-15131-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 372 CRM-M-15131-2025 Date of Decision: 21.07.2025 KHUSHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Present: Mr. Neesh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, Deputy, A.G., Punjab. Ms. Nanika Bansal, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 (Through V.C.) N. S. SHEKHAWAT
, J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of an FIR No.194 dated 16.12.2024 under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333, 191(3), 190 BNS and DDR No.31 dated 01.01.2025 under Section 118(2) BNS registered at Police Station Boha, District Mansa, Punjab (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit dated 08.01.2025 (Annexure P-3). VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.22 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order
CRM-M-15131-2025
2. Vide order dated 20.03.2025, while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 08.01.2025 (Annexure P-3). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Budhlada and got their statements recorded. Report dated 04.04.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6.
Resultantly, FIR No.194 dated 16.12.2024 under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333, 191(3), 190 BNS and DDR No.31 VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.22 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order
CRM-M-15131-2025
dated 01.01.2025 under Section 118(2) BNS registered at Police Station Boha, District Mansa, Punjab (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 21.07.2025. (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.07.22 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order