KALU SINGH ALIAS SACHGOPAL SINGH ALIAS GOPAL SINGH S/O SHRI JAISINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/2244/2024 · 2025-01-30
Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35248 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35248 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4227-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2244/2024 Kalu Singh Alias Sachgopal Singh Alias Gopal Singh S/o Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bambuli, Police Station Devlimanjhi, District Kota Rural (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, Kota (Raj.).
3. The Superintendent, District Jail Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA-cum-AAG assisted by Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 30/01/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition (parole) seeking first regular parole for a period of 20 days.
2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that jail conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than six and a half years.
3. Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the writ petition and contends that Superintendent of Police, has not recommended case of the petitioner for grant of benefit of parole. He contends that the case in which accused-petitioner is undergoing sentence being of serious nature, it might affect the society as well as
[2025:RJ-JP:4227-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-2244/2024] the complainant if he is released on parole. He further contends that the Social Welfare Officer has not recommended the release of petitioner on parole.
4. We have considered the contentions.
5. Since jail conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory and no documentary evidence in support of adverse police report has been placed on record to deny prayer for grant of first regular parole to the petitioner, we deem it proper to allow present writ petition (parole) and set aside the order /recommendation dated 29.02.2024/04.03.2024 qua the petitioner.
6. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) is accordingly, allowed. The
order/recommendation dated 29.02.2024/04.03.2024 of the District Parole Advisory Committee, Kota qua the petitioner is quashed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on first regular parole for a period of 20 days on furnishing of his personal bonds of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, District Jail, Tonk with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself before the Jail Authorities on the expiry of parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility during parole period.
7. In case of failure to surrender by stipulated date, the Jail Authorities shall proceed in accordance with Law.
8. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to send a copy of this order to Superintendent, District Jail, Tonk by fax today itself for necessary compliance.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J INDER /36