1 2025:CGHC:28375-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1500 of 2020 Pawan Kumar Singh S/o Dharamnath Singh, Aged About 37 Years R/o Vasundhara Vihar, Qtr No. S-4, G-22, Godanpur, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) --- Petitioner Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Home Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer, Police Station Ambikapur Dehat, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Jagriti Mishra, W/o Late Abhishek Garg, Aged About 35 Years R/o Court Colony, Jashpur Nagar, Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) --- Respondents CRMP No. 824 of 2022 Neeta Garg W/o Late Anant Ram Garg Aged About 61 Years R/o Garg Transport, Near Fci Godown Railway Station Road, Vishrampur, Tehsil Surajpur, District - Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Home Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer Police Station - Ambikapur Dehat, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Jagriti Mishra W/o Late Abhishek Garg Aged About 35 Years R/o Court Colony, Jashpur Nagar, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.06.28 11:36:40 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocate For State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 27 .06.2025 1. Heard Mr. Vaibhav P. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State. 2. In CRMP No.1500/2020, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “(a) To quash the impugned F.I.R. dated 06/12/2020 registered by Police Station Ambikapur Dehat against the Petitioner and the consequent proceedings pursuant to that F.I.R. (b) To call for the entire records regarding the case from Respondent authorities. (c) Pass any other further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.” 3. In CRMP No.824/2022, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “(a) To quash the impugned F.I.R. dated 06/12/2020 registered by Police Station 3 Ambikapur Dehat against the Petitioner and the consequent proceedings pursuant to that F.I.R. (b) To call for the entire records regarding the case from Respondent authorities. (c) Pass any other further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.” 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the compromise had already been taken place between the parties i.e. the petitioner and the complainant, as such, he does not want to pursue these petitions. 5. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petitions are dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu