Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35227 (CHH)

BASANT CHANDRAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3397/2020 · 2025-04-23

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:18415 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3397 of 2020 1 - Basant Chandrakar S/o Late Sarju Chandrakar Aged About 58 Years R/o Ward No. 16, Sheetala, Para, Mahasamund, Tehsil District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chintamani Chandrakar S/o Late Sarju Chandrakar Aged About 48 Years R/o Ward No. 16, Sheetala, Para, Mahasamund, Tehsil District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 3 - Indaru Chandrakar S/o Late Sarju Chandrakar Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 16, Sheetala, Para, Mahasamund, Tehsil District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2-Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 3- Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)/land Acquisition Officer Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tehsildar Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For State : Mr. Sanjeev Agrwal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23.04.2025 Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 1) The petitioners have filed this writ petition assailing the order dated 24.08.2020 passed by the Collector, Mahasamund, whereby the application moved by the petitioners for correction of revenue records was rejected. 2) Mr. Koshta, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submits that the order passed by the Collector, Mahasamund is appealable before the Commissioner under the provisions of Section 44 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. 3) Mr. Agrawal, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, endorses the submission made by Mr. Koshta. 4) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Koshta, the present writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to prefer a duly constituted appeal before the Commissioner, and in turn, the Commissioner is directed to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioners expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. 5) Certified copy, if any, be returned to the petitioners after retaining a photocopy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM