Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35223 (JHR)

SONA PANDIT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5934/2024 · 2025-05-01

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13322 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5934 of 2024 ------ 1. Sona Pandit 2. Rajendra Pandit … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. ----- 07/ 01.05.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.36 of 2024, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 324, 307, 379, 452, 427 and 354 C IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Judicial Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. It is alleged that these petitioners along with other co- accused have entered into the house of the informant by breaking the gate and starting beating them by tangi, lathi, sword etc. They also robbed Rs.1 lac cash. They assaulted daughter-in-law of the informant on her head resulting in grievous injury. Podina Devi and Khublal Pandit who came to rescue them were also beaten with rods by Sona Pandit, Rajendra Pandit, Khudi Pandit and Suresh Pandit. 2025:JHHC:13322 2 5. Considering the nature of allegation, assault made by the petitioners and the nature of injury, this Court does not find it a fit case to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. 7. The petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court below. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3