Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35223 (HP)

VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF HP

CRMP/5039/2025 · 2025-11-21

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vijay Kumar vs State of H.P Cr.Revision No. 36 of 2015 21.11.2025 Present: Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Cr.MP No. 5039 of 2025 The present application has been filed for furnishing the surety bond. It has been asserted that the petitioner was arrested by the police in NDPS case, he remained in judicial custody and due to this reason he could not furnish the surety bond. Since the arrest was beyond the control of a person, hence, in these circumstances, the application is allowed and time to furnish the surety bond is extended by two weeks. The application stands disposed of. Cr.Revision No. 36 of 2015 As prayed, list after four weeks. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21th November, 2025 (ravinder)