2. On 11.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel submits that there is no allegation with regard to petitioner having connived with co-accused Sandeep Singh who got the property mutated in his and his sister’s fav be that as it may, it stands re of the complainant, thus, no loss has actually been caused. Co-accused Surinder Singh Dardi, Joginder Singh and Jagtar Singh have been granted interim anticipatory bail vide orders dated 28.11.2025, 02.12.2025 and 10.12.2025. He is not involved in any other case. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 17.12.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that there is no allegation with regard to petitioner having accused Sandeep Singh who got the property mutated in his and his sister’s favour, be that as it may, it stands re-mutated in the name of the complainant, thus, no loss has actually been accused Surinder Singh Dardi, Joginder Singh and Jagtar Singh have been granted interim anticipatory bail vide orders dated 02.12.2025 and 10.12.2025. He is not involved in any other case. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Gagandeep Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 17.12.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.23 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 23.12.2025.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jagtar Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 11.12.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.23 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.