BIMAL YADAV ALIAS GANESH YADAV ALIAS VIMAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9355/2025 · 2025-10-17
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35219 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35219 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:32302 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9355 of 2025
------ Bimal Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav @ Vimal Yadav, aged about 52 years, S/o- Masafir Yadav, R/o- Village-Jamuniya, P.O. & P.S.- Madanpur, District-Aurangabad, State-Bihar … … Petitioner
-Versus - The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : M/s. Nehala Sharmin, Special P.P.
----- 02/17.10.2025
Heard the parties
2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 380 of 2019 arising out of Nawdiha Bazar P.S. Case No. 05 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 322 of 2018, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 504, 506 of the I.P.C., Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act, Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and Sections 10, 13, 16, 20, 23 of the U.A.P. Act and Charge has been framed under Section 147, 148, 353/149, 307/149, 504/149 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 35, 26(2), 35, 27, 35 of the Arms Act, and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act , pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- III, Palamau. 3. It is alleged that on 08.02.2018, on the basis of confidential information, police party raided a place near Junjulu forest. There ensued cross firing between the extremists and police party due to which one extremists died. The arrested accused persons disclosed the name of other persons who were present at the place of occurrence but managed to escape. Police also recovered arms and ammunition from there. Petitioner was not arrested at the place of occurrence and his name has transpired on the basis of confession of co-accused. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court as well as by this Court. 4. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Palamau in connection with S.T. Case No. 380 of 2019 arising out of Nawdiha Bazar P.S. Case No. 05 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 322 of 2018. (Ambuj Nath, J.) October 17, 2025 Nandini/- Uploaded