Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010554322008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 167/2008 Between:
1. T. SUDHAKAR BABU, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM PRIVATE SERVICE R/O FLAT NO. G1, AKASH BHAVANI RESIDENCY PLOT NO. 10, NEHRU NAGAR, BACK SIDE OF NIRMAN TOWERS 10-3-1/13, EAST MAREDPALLY
...APPELLANT AND
1. MR T LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM ADVOCATE R/O FLAT NO. 416, SOVEREIGN SHELTER APARTMENTS LAKDIKAPOOL GREATER HYDERABAD.
2. T MOHANA RANGAM, S/O LATE T. GOBINDASWAMY CHETTI ADVOCATE R/O D.NO. 10-2-87, THIRITHAKATTTA STREET TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DIST.
3. T MANOHAR BABU, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM RETD. EMPLOYEE R/O FLAT NO. 102 P-69, OPP: TO TIRUMALA APARTMENTS ARUNODAYA COLONY
4. MR T HARINARAYANA, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE R/O D.NO. 1-49/6F, PLOT NO. 125, STREER NO. 3 SURYANAGAR COLONY
5. T RAVISHANKER, S/O T. MOHANA RANGAM EMPLOYEE R/O D.NO.
10-2-87, THIRTHAKATTTA STREET TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DIST.
6. SMT T PADMALOCHANA DEVI, W/O SAMPATH KUMAR HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO. D-4, III FLOOR, 184 LAKEVIEW ROAD, MAMBALAM, CHENNAI TAMILNADU STATE.
...RESPONDENT(S): appeal against the judgment & decree dt. 11-10-07 in OS NO. 40/98 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Dist. Judge, Tirupati IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 118 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the judgment and decree dt. 11- 10-07 in OS No. 40/98 on the file of the IV Addl. District Judge, Tirupati IA NO: 1 OF 2014(ASMP 8912 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. M SHIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA
2. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU
3. .
4. P NAGA PRADEEP
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he had filed a memo dated 08.07.2025, vide U.S.R.No.68386 of 2025 before the Registry, stating that the appellant is intending to withdraw the present appeal and the same is placed on record. The representation made by the learned counsel for the appellant is recorded.
2. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Date.09.07.2025
CVD