r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY i( TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 29303 OF onoA AMARAVATI RAO Between: Karam Chinna Lakshmi, S/o. Karam Satyanarayana years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. 1-7, Jaggampalem, Gangavaram Sitha Rama Raju District. Dora Age about of 53 Mandal, Alluri ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, r Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Paderu, Alluri Seetharamaraju District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer-Cum-Sub-Collector Village and Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District. 4. The Thasildar, Gangavaram, Alluri Seetharamaraj 5. The Jaggampalem Grama Panchayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary Gangavaram Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District, 6. Silam Ganesh @ Karam Ganesh, S/o. Sllam Appa Rao Aged about 45, Occ. Washermen, R/o. Jaggampalem, Gangavaram Mandal Rama Raju District. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department, Secretariat, Rompachodavaram u District. , Alluri Sitha ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution that in the circumstances stated of India is filed praying in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Respondent No. 2 to 5 i more particularly declaring the action of the in not restraining the illegal/Unauthorised one construction in Sy No. 50 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents of Jaggamapalem Village, Gangavaram Mandal, Alluri Sitha Rama Raju District District (East Godavari District) by the Respondent No. 6 in spite of the representaions dated. 21.11.2024 as illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and opposed to Article 300-A of the Constitution 'and also contrary to the procedure Gramapanchayat Act and consequently direct the Respondent to restrain the illegal/Unauthorised construction in Sy No. 50 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents of Jaggamapalem Village, Gangavaram Mandal Rama Raju District District (East Godavari District) by the Respondent No. of India contemplate under the A.P. No. 2 and 4 Alluri Sitha 6. lA NO: 1 OF 2n9A Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed iin support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No. 2 and 4 to restrain the Illegal/Unauthorised construction in Sy No. 50 to an extent of Ac 0 25 cents of Jaggamapalem Village, Gangavaram Mandal Raju District District (East Godavari Alluri Sitha Rama District) by the Respondent No. 6 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ rural dev 's. 3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE SRI Y KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR ZPPS, MPPS & GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI P RAJESH BABU The Court made the following ORDER: Counsel for the Respondent No Counsel for the Respondent No.5: APHC010557462024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 29303/2024 [3330] Between: Karam Chinna Lakshmi ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SHAIKMEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2 P RAJESH BABU 3.GP FOR REVENUE ThP Court made the following order: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.29303 of 2024 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to grant leave for withdrawal of this writ petition on the ground that the writ petitioner has addressed a letter, dated 11.02.2025 to the counsel for the petitioner requesting to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to challenge the endorsement issued by the Tahsildar, Gangavaram. Learned counsel also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement of the Tahsildar, Gangavaram. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/~ N. NAGAMWIA ASSISTANT REGISTJRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. SHAIK MEERAVALI, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI P RAJESH BABU, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI Y KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR ZPPS, MPPS & GRAM PANCHAYAT [OPUC] 4. Two CCS to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies PRK HIGH COURT DATED: 18/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.29303 of 2024 o 13 m 2c:3 X ' ^ Current Section DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS