Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35199 (RAJ)

SHYAM LAL SWAMI S/O PRABHU DAYAL SWAMI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19425/2024 · 2025-01-16

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2268] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19425/2024 Shyam Lal Swami S/o Prabhu Dayal Swami, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of H.no. 151/18, Shipra Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Retired As Lecturer, Secondary Education Department. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary To The Government, Department Of Education (School), Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Directorate, Bikaner. 3. The Deputy Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur (Raj). 4. The District Education Officer, Secondary -I (Madhyamik), Dudu, (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Patni For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner was superannuated on 30.06.2014 from the post of Lecturer. The instant petition is filed seeking directions for grant of selection scale, which is not given to him on lapse of 18, 27 years of service. Further, learned counsel has submitted that petitioner has filed representations dated 19.02.2015 (Annexure-18) and 19.12.2018 (Annexure-19), however, no heed is paid to the same by the respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:2268] (2 of 2) [CW-19425/2024] This Court upon a perusal of the file has noted that after being superannuated in the year 2014, the present petition is filed in the year 2024. It is annexed that the petitioner has filed representations (Annexure-18 & 19) however, the receipt of the representations is not supported by any registered acknowledgment due nor any serial number is reflected on the same. Therefore, considering the foregoing facts and circumstances this Court directs respondent No.4 to consider the said representations on merits, strictly in accordance with law, by way of a speaking order and examine the fact that whether the said representations were filed a decade back or otherwise. In light of above, the petition is disposed of with the direction to consider the representations of the petitioner as stated above within a period of 30 days from the date of passing of this order. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/60