Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35199 (AP)

M/s. GVR Infraprojects Ltd., v. Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14196/2014 · 2025-02-24

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010555832014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14196/2014 Between: M/s. Gvr Infraprojects Ltd., ...PETITIONER AND Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents are seizing the stone crushing machine No.NW7150C, Model No.B7150SE, mounted on the chassis No.066/01/08, along with the prime mover No.TN01 AF0873, as per Check Report No.044002, dated 11.04.2014, by the 4th respondent, on the ground that the same is Motor Vehicle and has to be subjected to Motor Vehicle Tax, which is contrary to the law. The petitioner seeks the release of the said vehicle. 3. The petitioner further relies upon the judgment in Khader Basha and others v. Regional Transport Officer, Chittoor and others1. 4. The petitioner argues that the respondents should determine the liability for the life tax, and in the absence of such determination, the respondents cannot seize the vehicle under the guise of non-payment of the life tax. Hence, the present writ petition. 1 2012 (6) ALT 660 (D.B.) 3 5. At this stage, this Court passed an interim order on 29.04.2014, directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only), pursuant to which the respondents released the vehicle. 6. Learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondents submits that, in view of the interim orders of this Court dated 29.04.2014, the vehicle has already been released, and no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition, as the grievance of the petitioner pertains to the interim order. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondents, this Court is of the considered view that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps without following due process of law. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24.02.2025 lsp 4 212 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.14196 of 2014 24.02.2025 lsp