IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 18566/2025 Decided on: 01.12.2025 1. CWP No. 18566/2025 Rajender Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 18564/2025 Shashi Bala & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 3. CWP No. 18568/2025 Kanta Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 4. CWP No. 18570/2025 Ashwani Kumar & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 For the petitioners: Mr. Neeraj Sharma Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankit Dhiman and Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of the respondents in all the petitions. 2. Petitioners are seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 3. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of their grievance raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring their respective representations within two weeks from today. In case, such representations are so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024 3 5. The instant petitions are disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 1st December, 2025(rohit)