1 2025:CGHC:37512 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8086 of 2025 1 - Umesh Kumar Prajapati S/o Shivdayal Prajapati, Aged About 41 Years Occupation- Lecturer (Physics) Posted At Government High School Kewdashila, Block Ramchandrapur, Distt. Balrampur Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate, Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block Indiravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Joint Director, Education Department Ambikapur, Division Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Collector And Chairman District Rationalization Committee Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Secretary And District Education Officer District Level Rationalization Committee Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Block Education Officer Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiya, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 31.07.2025 Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Lecturer under the Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 20.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted a Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification dated 08.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil