Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56213 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9489 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Kajal And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Sri Nirbhay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 preferred vakalatnama which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ashish Dwivedi, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Nirbhay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that there is a permanent threat at the behest of respondent no. 4 i.e. Mr. Rajendra Giri son of late Raj Giri who is father of petitioner no. 1 and direction for seeking police protection has been sought through prayer no. 1 of instant petition in shape of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 3 not to interfere in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners and not to visit and knock the door of the petitioners. 4. At the behest of respondent nos. 2 and 3, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel is appearing who informed that no harassment as mentioned in the petition has been ever carried out by respondent nos. 2 and 3, so far as respondent no. 4 is concerned, unfortunately he himself is present before the Court and submitted that no problem has ever been created against petitioner nos. 1 and 2 at his behest, otherwise it is the family members of petitioner no. 2 who will create problem for respondent no. 4 being father of the petitioner no. 1. 5. After having the rival submissions extended by learned counsel for the parties, one thing is crystal clear that either of the parties are having no problem with each other, rather, in apprehension both the parties are leading suffocative life. All the parties mentioned in the instant petition are hereby set free to lead their proper life and being abundant cautious, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel is requested to intimate, respondent no. 2 that father of petitioner no. 1 being respondent no. 4 has personally appeared before the Court and as such the allegation whatsoever has been made through the instant petition are not sustainable and as such in pursuance to the marriage of petitioner nos. 1 and 2, no harassment may be carried out against the married couple. 6. The instant petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad