2025:JHHC:32285 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4316 of 2025 1. Shakila Bano, wife of Khetab Ahmad, aged about 54 years, resident of Ward No. 02, Sharif Nagar, Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 2. Naushad Khan, son of Aihshan Khan, aged about 52 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 3. Mokhtar Khan, son of Late Inayat Khan, aged about 49 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 4. Taufik Khan, son of Md. Mustaque Khan, aged about 46 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 5. Md. Ishaque Ansari, son of Amirjan Ansari, aged about 45 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 6. Ishaque Ansari, son of Habib Ansari, aged about 48 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 7. Alijaan Ansari, son of Late Md. Sarif Ansari, aged about 67 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 8. Rahamalulla Khan, son of Late Kamdaar Khan, aged about 56 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 9. Aabda Khatoon, wife of Md. Imtiyaz Ali, aged about 47 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 10. Sulemaan Akhtar, son of Late Usman Akhtar, aged about 65 years, resident of Village: Unchari, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. …….. Petitioners Vrs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 3. The Circle Officer, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. 4. Vinod Prasad, son of Ramdas Ram, resident of Village: Unchari, Near Ramasahu School, P.O. & P.S: Garhwa, District: Garhwa. .......... Respondents ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Rohit, Advocate For the Resp. No.4 : Mr. Shyam Sundar Pd. Kushwaha, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mrs. Nirupama, A.C to Sr.S.C.-II 03/17.10.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 3. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 17.10.2025 A.Mohanty