IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23867 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2024 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Wasim Khan S/o- Md. Asim Khan Village- Nawada P.S-Mohiuddin Nagar District-Samastipur 2. Om Prakash Singh @ Bharti @ Banti S/o- Siyaram Singh @ Sukhlu Singh Village- Hemanpur P.S-Mohiuddin Nagar District-Samastipur 3. Sahil Kumar S/o- Raghunath Sahni Village- Hemanpur P.S-Mohiuddin Nagar District-Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mohiuddinnagar P.S. Case No. 284 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 128(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 103(1), 61(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.) and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. According to FIR, the informant asked his grandson (the deceased) to bring some medicines and in course of returning to his house after taking medicines, as soon as his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23867 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 grandson reached near his house, 12 named accused persons including the petitioners started assaulting his grandson. The son of the informant went to rescue the injured. The accused persons assaulted badly to the son of the informant. His son apprised the informant that the accused persons badly assaulted him with daggers, lathi, iron rod, farsa etc. His son died in the way to the hospital. The reason behind the occurrence is stated that co- accused Saurav Singh used to tease the granddaughter of the informant and on protest, the accused persons had threatened to lift the granddaughter of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, there was land dispute between the parties and one person of defense side had also lost his life and in this regard, the members of defense side had lodged a case against the prosecution side. 5. On the otherhand, learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the petitioners and other accused persons named in the FIR badly assaulted the deceased, resulted into his death. The deceased himself apprised the name of the accused persons to his father (the informant). The postmortem report corroborates the allegation. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23867 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, presently I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and accordingly, the same is rejected. A.K.V.//- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T