1 2025:CGHC:3468 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1976 of 2018 Ritendra Kumar Solanki S/o Late C.S. Solanki Aged About 57 Years R/o- Mig-C/330, Padhmanabhpur, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Central Beaureau Of Investigation Through- Its Superintendent Of Police, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2. Kantilal Jobanputra S/o Jayantilal Jobanputra Aged About 65 Years R/o Mangal Smriti, Bajpai Ground, Behind Pratap Talkies, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Nilesh Jobanputra S/o Kantilal Jobanputra Aged About 45 Years R/o- Mangal Smriti, Bajpai Ground, Behind Pratap Talkies, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. A.K. Chatarji S/o Unknown To Petitioner R/o- Amba Apartment, 1st Floor, Flat No. A/204, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. S.K. Shukla The Then Dy. Cee/construction/raipur Secr, Bilaspur, Presently Posted At Dy. Cee, Mumbai H.Q. Central Railway, Mumbai (Maharastra), District : Mumbai, Maharashtra 6. Railway Board Ministry Of Railways, Through Its Advisor/executive Director (Vigilence), Rail Bhawan, Raisena Road, New Delhi,, District : New Delhi, Delhi ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : None. For Respondents (s) : None. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 20/01/2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondents to press this petition on repeated calls when the case is called out. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this instant petition and direct the respondent authorities to register the First Information Report against the respondent No. 2 to 5 on the petitioner’s complaint dated 22.02.2016 (Annexure P/8) and to investigate the matter by the respondent No. 1 and also to conclude the investigation within a fixed time period, in the interest of Justice” 3. Under such circumstance, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter any further. Hence, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the petition. 4. From perusal of the order sheet of the trial Court, it transpires that no interim order was passed in the present case. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal