SMT RAMMA DAUGHTER OF BHARTA v. TOFLI DAUGHTER OF SARDARA
CFA/1510/2024 · 2025-02-13
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35172 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35172 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 1510/2024
1. Smt Ramma Daughter Of Bharta, Aged About 32 Years, (Deceased). 1/1. Vishram Son Of Late Bhoma Ram, Resident Of Village Hadli Dorata Ki Dhani, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.). 1/2. Lali Daughter Of Late Bhoma Ram, (Wife Of Mukesh), At Present Resident Of Village Kishorepura, Tehsil Bansoor, District Alwar (Raj.). 1/3. Parvati Daughter Of Late Bhoma Ram (Wife Of Rakesh), At Present Resident Of Village Robada, Tehsil And District Alwar(Raj.). 1/4. Manju Daughter Of Late Bhoma Ram, (Wife Of Sachin) At Present Resident Of Village Kishorepura, Tehsil Bansoor, District Alwar (Raj.).
2. Smt. Mali Daughte Of Sardara, Resident Of Village Laduwas, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.).
3. Ram Karan Adopted Son Of Sardara, Resident Of Village Laduwas, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.). ----Appellants Versus
1. Tofli Daughter Of Sardara, Resident Of Village Laduwas, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.).
2. Arvind Kumar Son Of Dilip Singh, Resident Of Dhani Jaitpur, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari (Haryana). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Sampti Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order 13/02/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:6451] (2 of 2) [CFA-1510/2024] Matter comes up on an application (I.A. No. 1/2025) for deciding the appeal in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel for the respondents submit that both the parties have arrived at a compromise and on account of compromise, the
judgment and decree dated 22.10.2024 passed by the trial Court be modified and the appeal be disposed of accordingly. The appellant Nos. 1/1 to 1/3, 2 and 3 and respondents are present today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the courts order sheet and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel. For the reasons stated above, the application is allowed and the original compromise filed with the application is taken on record. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the impugned judgment and decree dated 22.10.2024 passed by the trial court is modified and the appeal stands disposed of accordingly. Terms and conditions of the compromise shall be treated as an integral part of this order. Decree be drawn accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/156