Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:13078 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 2024 of 2025
---- Savitri Devi, aged about 54 years, wife of late Fakira Sahu, resident of Radha Nagar, College Road Nagar, Lohardaga, P.O. & P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand.
..........Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, At-Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga, At, P.O. & P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand.
5. The Regional Joint Director of Education, North Chotangapur, Hazaribagh, At, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
6. The District Superintendent of Education, Lohardaga, At, P.O. & P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand.
.........Respondents
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Shubham Mishra, AC to SC(M)-II
---- 02/01.05.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner for his promotion on Grade-3 i.e. Matric Trained Selection Grade w.e.f. 01.04.2000, as the husband of the petitioner, who died on 09.03.2020, fulfilled all criteria for grant of Grade-3 which is completion of 12 years of service from the date of Grade-2.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are sitting tight over the matter in spite of repeated requests and representations filed by her. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner being the widow of the deceased employee is running from pillar to post; accordingly, respondents may be
directed to take decision and pay admitted dues to this petitioner at the earliest.
2025:JHHC:13078 2
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter-affidavit has been filed as such, the petitioner shall approach the 3rd respondent for redressal of her grievances.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter with regard to the grievance raised by the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law and applicable Rules and Regulations within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to serve a copy of this writ application to the 3rd respondent at the earliest.
5. Needless to say that admitted dues for which the petitioner would be found entitled, shall be paid to her within a further period of 6 weeks.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Kunal