Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3517 (RAJ)

PUSHPENDRA SINGH S/O PRAHLAD SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/672/2025 · 2025-01-20

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2601] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.672/2025 Pushpendra Singh S/o Prahlad Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o New Tilpath Colony, Faridabad Tehsil Faridabad District Faridabad Hariyana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.274/2023, registered at Police Station Ramganj Mandi, District Kota Rural for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel further submits that the recovery of contraband article was effected from the car which does not belong to the present accused-petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:2601] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-672/2025] 4. Heard and perused the material placed on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the recovery of smack weighing 938 grams was effected from Swift car bearing registration No.HR-51-CH-6497 and petitioner was found in the said vehicle, therefore, considering the commercial quantity recovered from the accused-petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Hence, the bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner is dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-1