Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35163 (CHH)

Mukesh Sahu v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1197/2021 · 2025-03-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10488-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1197 of 2021 1 - Mukesh Sahu S/o Mahendra Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Agarkhar Darri, Police Station Darri, District Korba Chhattisgarh 2 - Mahendra Sahu S/o B. P. Sahu Aged About 57 Years R/o Agarkhar Darri, Police Station Darri, District Korba Chhattisgarh 3 - Kaushaliya Sahu W/o Mahendra Sahu Aged About 52 Years R/o Agarkhar Darri, Police Station Darri, District Korba Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Darri District Korba Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Neetu Sahu D/o Rameshwar Sahu Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Agarkhar, Police Station - Darri, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hari Om Rai, P.L. for the State Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, Advocate for Res. No. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board On 04.03.2025 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 1. The present CrMP has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “ Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR (Annexure-P/2) which 2 registered the Police of Police Station Darri against the petitioners in Crime No. 249/2020 in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard, Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu, leaned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hari Om Rai, Panel lawyer for the State and Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2. 3. In compliance of the Court’s order dated 17.10.2023, the case was referred to Mediation Centre of this Court and as per the report of the Mediation Centre, it appears that the parties have compromised the matter and the amount of Rs. 7,00,000/- has also been paid by the petitioner to the Respondent No. 2. 4. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 also admits the facts and not opposes. 5. Considering the fact that the parties are entered into compromise, the present Cr.MP is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sagrika SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.03.05 16:58:24 +0530