MANIRAM JAT SON OF SHYOJI JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLAS/3384/2024 · 2025-02-11
Anil Kumar Upman
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35162 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35162 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3384/2024 Maniram Jat Son Of Shyoji Jat, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Sandoliya, Police Station Arain, District Ajmer. (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Victim, R/o ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 11/02/2025
1. This instant appeal has been filed under Section 14(2)(A) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act being aggrieved of the order dated 09.12.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer in Bail Application No.1193/2024 (CIS No.1193/2024) rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.109/2024 registered at Police Station Arai, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2) & 78(2) of BNS. Charge-sheet has been filed for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 78(2), 74, 76 & 351(2) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(w)(i) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
[2025:RJ-JP:6117] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-3384/2024]
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that after investigation, police has filed charge-sheet against the appellant. Learned counsel submits that appellant has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 07.12.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the appellant would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor oppose the prayer of bail made in this appeal.
4. Heard. Perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant as also considering the fact that appellant has no criminal antecedents; charge-sheet has been filed as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.
6. Consequently, these instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 09.12.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Maniram Jat Son Of Shyoji Jat, arrested in connection with aforesaid FIR No. 109/2024 registered at Police Station Arai, District Ajmer, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear
[2025:RJ-JP:6117] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-3384/2024] before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /220