Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3516 (KER)

RAHUL TOM v. SRI.PREM KRISHNAN S, IAS,

Con.Case(C)/406/2025 · 2025-03-25

Gopinath P

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:26075 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 406 OF 2025 JUDGMENT DATED 13.11.2024 IN WP(C) NO.34637/2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: RAHUL TOM, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. TOM THOMAS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KONDODY MOTORS PVT.LTD. KODIMATHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT KONDODICKAL HOUSE, VADAVATHUR P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686010. BY ADV SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 SRI.PREM KRISHNAN S, IAS, AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PARAYIL BUILDING, COLLEGE ROAD, MAKAMKUNNU PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN – 689645. 2 SRI.V.G.VINOD KUMAR, IPS, AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PARAYIL BUILDING, COLLEGE ROAD, MAKAMKUNNU PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN – 689645. CON.CASE(C) NO. 406 OF 2025 IN W.P(C)NO.34637/2024 2 2025:KER:26075 3 SRI.JOSHY K., AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, SOUTH ZONE AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PARAYIL BUILDING, COLLEGE ROAD, MAKAMKUNNU PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN – 689645. 4 SRI.ANSARI, AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PARAYIL BUILDING, COLLEGE ROAD, MAKAMKUNNU PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN – 689645. SRI. P.S.APPU, GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CON.CASE(C) NO. 406 OF 2025 IN W.P(C)NO.34637/2024 3 2025:KER:26075 JUDGMENT The learned Government Pleader submits that the judgment has been complied with and the application for renewal has been considered and renewal has been granted to the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has not been communicated. 3. The learned Government Pleader submits that the order will be communicated without undue delay. Taking the aforesaid submissions into consideration, the Contempt of Court case is closed. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK CON.CASE(C) NO. 406 OF 2025 IN W.P(C)NO.34637/2024 4 2025:KER:26075 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 406/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.11.2024 IN W.P.(C) NO.34637 OF 2024 Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT REGARDING REMITTANCE OF THE FEE FOR RENEWAL IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER