ZEESHAN ASHRAF v. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE
WP/30359/2024 · 2025-03-17
Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35152 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35152 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10919-DB WP No. 30359 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 30359 OF 2024 (EDN-MED-ADM)
BETWEEN:
ZEESHAN ASHRAF AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS S/O ASHRAF ZIAUDDIN RESIDING AT G-85/2, 3RD FLOOR BLOCK G, THOKAR No.4 ABUL FAZAL ENCLAVE- 1 JAMIA NAGAR, SOUTH DELHI-110 025 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARIKRISHNA PRAMOD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 041 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
2.
JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY MAULANA MOHAMMED ALI MARG JAMIA NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
3.
THE OXFORD MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE HOSUR ROAD, YADAVANAHALLI ATTIBELE HOBLI, BENGALURU-562 107
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10919-DB WP No. 30359 of 2024
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. SATYANARAYANA P., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO (a) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT,
ORDER OR DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT No.1 TO ISSUE AN ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE TO THE PETITIONER AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT No.3 TO CONFIRM THE ADMISSION OF THE PETITIONER ON OBTAINING SUCH ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATE FROM THE RESPONDENT No.1 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10919-DB WP No. 30359 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition as the relief sought for has become infructuous.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31