Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3515 (PAT)

Santu Kumar @ Amrit Raj v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./77911/2025 · 2026-02-24

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77911 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2025 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Santu Kumar @ Amrit Raj S/o Ramashish Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Mahmana, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 24-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Pramod Kumar and Vikash Kumar had approached this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.55165 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 24.02.2026 with liberty to them to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is also submitted that the case was considered on merits and in detail. 3. The learned A.P.P. does not oppose the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. The Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, hence rejected. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77911 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T