Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3515 (AP)

SREE SUDARSANA CONSTRUCTIONS v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/1003/2025 · 2025-01-10

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010018762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1003/2025 Between: Sree Sudarsana Constructions ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “… pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the Demand Notice NO.647/Q/202418 dated 22.05.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent herein as highly illegal arbitrary unreasonable violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14 and 19(1)g of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concessions Rules 1966 and Andhra Pradesh Mineral Dealers Rules 2017 and consequently setaside the Demand Notice No 647/Q/2024-18 dated 22.05.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent herein and pass….…….” 2. Heard Mr P.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for Respondents. 3. On hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.24660 of 2024, dated 28.10.2024, and hence, requests this Court to pass similar order in this petition also. The operative portion of the said order is as follows:- 7. Accordingly the impugned Demand Notice bearing No.647/Q/2024-38, dated 20.08.2024, issued by the 3rd respondent is hereby set aside. The 3rd respondent is directed to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner on 07.06.2024 and pass appropriate reasoned orders in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the petitioner herein within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents opposed for grant of any relief in the writ petition and prayed to dismiss the same. 5. In view of the submission made by both the learned counsels and upon perusing the entire material available on record, this Court deems fit to dispose of the present Writ Petition in terms of the said order. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.24660 of 2024, dated 28.10.2024. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order passed in W.P.No.24660 of 2024, dated 28.10.2024 to this order. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date 10.01.2025 TM