[2025:RJ-JP:19642] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19211/2024 Anita Rathor D/o Shri Nathu Lal Rathor, W/o Shri Naresh Solanki, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Kundla Kalan Post Bortalab, District Banswara(Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department Rajasthan, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Rajasthan State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla Ms. Sunita Mehla Mr. Nagendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Ms. Anjali Sharma Mr. Rahul Verma Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/05/2025 1. Petitioner is an aspirant for the post of Nursing Officer and applied for the same under the category of OBC-NCL, pursuant to Advertisement dated 05.05.2023. In the Advertisement, specific stipulations in respect of validity of the Caste certificates have been mentioned, which reads as under: "N½ izek.k i=ksa dk lR;kiku nLrkost lR;kiu ds fy, vkeaf=r fd, tkus dh fLFkfr esa ewy nLrkost dk feyku lgh ik;s tkus ij gh vkosnd dks oxZ fo'ks"k ¼vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr@vU; fiNM+k oxZ@ vfr fiNM+k oxZ@vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ@mRd`"V f[kykM+h@HkwriwoZ lSfud@fo/kok@fofPNUu [2025:RJ-JP:19642] (2 of 2) [CW-19211/2024] fookg@fo'ks"k ;ksxtu vkfn½ dh ik=rk dk ykHk ns; gksxk! vr% ik=rk dh tk¡p gsrq fuEufyf[kr nLrkost izLrqr djuk lqfuf'pr dj fy;k tk;s%& 1. dkfeZd ¼d&2½ foHkkx ds ifji= fnukad 20-01-2022 ds vuqlkj vuqlwfpr tkfr] vuqlwfpr tutkfr] vU; fiNM+k oxZ] vfr fiNM+k oxZ ,oa vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ ds vkosndksa dks vkj{k.k dk ykHk ysus gsrq tkfr izek.k&i= vkWuykbu vkosnu dh vfUre frfFk rd tkjh fd;k gqvk izLrqr djuk gksxkA mDr esa dkfeZd ¼d&2½ foHkkx ds ifji= Øekad ia- 7¼1½ dkfeZd@d&2@2019 fnukad 17-10-2022 ds vuqlkj fu/kkZj.k izek.k i= ,oa 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k tk ldsxkA vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr ds fy, tkjh fd;s x;s tkfr izek.k i=ksa dh vof/k thou i;Zur gksxh tcfd vU; fiNM+k oxZ] vfr fiNM+k oxZ ,oa vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ ds fy, lacf/kr izek.k i= dks Øhehys;j esa ugha gksus lac/kh rF; dks rhu o"kZ ds fof/k lEer 'kiFk i= ds vk/kkj ij ekU;rk nh tk;sxhA Øhehys;j esa ugha gksus laca/kh izek.k i= ,d o"kZ ds fy, ekU; gksxkA ,d ckj Øhehys;j esa ugha gksus dk izek.k i= tkjh gksus ds mijkUr vxj izkFkhZ vkxkeh o"kZ esa Hkh Øhehys;j esa ugha gS rks ,slh fLFkfr esa mlls lR;kfir 'kiFk i= ysdj iwoZ esa tkjh izek.k i= dks gh eku fy;k tk;sxkA ,slk vf/kdre rhu o"kZ rd fd;k tk ldrk gSA" 2. Indisputably, petitioner enclosed her Caste certificate of OBC-NCL dated 20.01.2016, which does not meet the requirements as stipulated hereinabove. Thereafter, petitioner before this Court has placed on record a fresh Caste certificate of OBC-NCL dated 31.05.2024, which too is of no significance for the purpose of considering her candidature in the present recruitment, since the Caste certificate of OBC-NCL, should relate to preceding one year from the last cut off date of submission of the online application form. 3. Thus, the respondents have not committed any illegality/ perversity in not considering the candidature of petitioner under the OBC-NCL category. 4. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing the writ petition for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the same. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/13