IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 391 CRM-M-15189-2025 Date of decision: 21.05.2025 Tejinderpal Singh @ Sonu and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present : Ms. Meena, Advocate and Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG Punjab. Ms. Shivani, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh Kanwar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.103 dated 15.12.2024 under Sections 125, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Section 333 of BNS, 2023 added lateron) registered at Police Station Chohla Sahib, District Tarn Taran and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at, between the parties. 2. Status report by way of affidavit of Atul Soni, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Kadoor Sahib, Camp at Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, on behalf of respondent No.1- State, has been filed in the Court today which is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. A copy of the same has been supplied to the VINAY 2025.05.22 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-15189-2025 -2- counsel opposite. 3. Vide order dated 20.03.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 21.04.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 4. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Tarn Taran, in pursuance of the directions of this Court. As per the report received, petitioner No.3-Baljinder Singh is a man of criminal antecedents as he is facing trial in one more case i.e. FIR No.99 dated 20.06.2020 under Sections 302, 506, 148, 149 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Chohla Sahib, which fact was withheld from this Court on the previous date of hearing. 5. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioners, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioners for withdrawal of the instant petition. 6. Dismissed as withdrawn. 21.05.2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2025.05.22 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment