NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8200 of 2025 Vinod Kumar Rajput Fahher Shri Jagannath Prasad Aged About 47 Years Profession- Assistant Teacher Government Primary School Lokhandi Development Block Takhatpur Resident -Village Lokhandi Tehsil - District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Of Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Naya Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector/ Chairman District Level Rationalization Committee Distt- Bilaspur District Bilaspur C.G. 4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Development Block Education Officer 5 - Block Education Officer Takhatpur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh C.G. ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri KS Saini, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 21.07.2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 13.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. Wps 8200 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances, and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma