[2025:RJ-JP:6769] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16105/2024 Shivani D/o Baje Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Aawalikhurd, Police Station Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Panwar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rohit Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.190/2024 registered at Police Station Sunel, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2) & 103(1) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is no evidence available on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. It is submitted that omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner in the FIR. Learned counsel argues that deceased is the uncle of the petitioner and there is a land dispute between the deceased and petitioner’s father. It is argued that as a matter of fact, petitioner came to her parental home to stay for sometime. Learned counsel contends that during [2025:RJ-JP:6769] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16105/2024] this period, alleged incident took place and without there being any evidence, petitioner has been roped in this case. It is contended that petitioner is having one year old baby with her in custody and she has been arrested on 01.10.2024. It is contended that investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that petitioner is a female and in custody along with her child; investigation has been completed and trial will take time in its conclusion; material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Shivani D/o Baje Singh shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:6769] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16105/2024] 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /377