Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3513 (UTT)

HASEEN ALI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/171/2025 · 2025-05-15

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.171 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Susheel Kumar, Advocate for respondent nos.3 and 4. 4. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation final report has been submitted on 09.03.2024. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 7. Accordingly the writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 15.05.2025 SK