APHC010551412022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4276/2022 Between: 1. P.NARAYANASWAMY, S/O. P. CHINNN VENGAMUNI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. GANDLAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, MUDIGUBBA MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P, SECRETARIAT,. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. SHRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, A.P., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. P BASAUTH KUMAR IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 4. NARAYANA NAYAK, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IB DIVISION, PENUKONDA, SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondent herein under the provisions of Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 for intentionally,deliberately, willfully violated the orders and disobedience of the Orders passed by His Lordships Honble Sri Justice VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA garu in W.P.No.8751/2022 dated 08.04.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SREE RAMULU NAIDU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. ASHOK RAM V 2. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:4276/2022 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.04.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8794 of 2022. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 08.04.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8794 of 2022 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have paid only approved bill amount but not the interest amount as claimed by the petitioner. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedings for further claim with regard to interest, if any. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 04.08.2025 BSP 182 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.4276 of 2022 04.08.2025 BSP