Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3512 (JHR)

B S S Pranavananda Vidya Mandir Middle Through Its Honorary Secretary Swami Pradiptanandajee v. Human Resources Department

WPC/158/2016 · 2025-09-17

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:29137 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.158 of 2016 ------- B.S.S. Pranavananda Vidya Mandir (Middle) through its Honorary Secretary, Swami Pradiptanandajee, Son of Swami Pranavanandajee Maharaj, Disciple of Shrimat Swami Pranavananda, having its Office at Sonari, P.O. & P.S. Sonari, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Jharkhand Mantralaya, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, having Office at Jharkhand Mantralaya, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Regional Education Officer, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. …..Respondents. 5. Lalit Prasad son of Shri J. N. Prasad, resident of 735, B Block, Sonari, P.O. & P.S. Sonari, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 6. Moytri Das wife of Shri Ajoy Das, resident of H. No.373, G Road, West Layout, Sonari, P.O. & P.S. Sonari, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. .……Performa Respondents ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. 2025:JHHC:29137 2 : Mr. Arpan Mishra, Adv. For the Respondents: Ms. Sunita Kumari, AC to Sr. SC-II ------- 15/17.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to want of instruction, he is unable to get the present status of the case. Accordingly, the instant application may be disposed of with a liberty to raise his grievance if the same has not yet been redressed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) September 17, 2025 Fahim/-