[2025:RJ-JP:15494-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Suspension of Sentence Application No. 107/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.29/2025 Jai Singh S/o Harsahai, Aged About 88 Years, Resident of Hanuman Vas, Police Station Khedli District Alwar (At present in Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application No. 2398/2024 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.476/2024 Karan Singh S/o Shri Ghisaram, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Hanumanwas, Police Station Kherli, District Alwar (Raj). ( At Present Confined in Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar Khandal Mr. Narendra Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. GA Mr. Surendra Singh for Complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 07/04/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:15494-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-107/2025] 1. These suspension of sentence applications have been filed by the applicants along with these appeals. 2. Counsel for the applicants have annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the applicants were on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicants under Section 302/149 of IPC and they are in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this matter. He further submits that the co-accused Mahendra Singh has caused head injury on the person of the deceased and hearing of appeals may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of these appeals. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by counsel for the complainant has opposed the applications for suspension of sentence. 4. We have heard counsels for the parties and perused the record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the applicants were on bail during trial and the hearing of appeals may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow these criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence applications. 6. In that view of the matter, these criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence applications are allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeals and the applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial [2025:RJ-JP:15494-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-107/2025] Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 26.05.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. Copy of this order be separately placed in each connected file. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J GARIMA /54-55