Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35115 (RAJ)

RAMNIWAS S/O SHRI HARIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/25115/2018 · 2025-09-18

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 25115/2018 Ramniwas S/o Shri Hariram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village And Post Shimla, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Raj, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 3. Dy. Director, Secondary Education, Churu Division, Churu 4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jhunjhunu 5. Principal (Peeo), Govt. Adarsh Sr. Secondary School, Rawan (Jhunjhunu) 6. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla with Ms. Sunita Mehla and Mr. Nagendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 18/09/2025 Indisputably, there is delay of two months in payment of retiral dues. Learned counsel for the respondents could not justify the delay. In view thereof, the petitioner is entitled for interest on delayed payment in terms of Rule 89 of the Pension Rules, 1996. [2025:RJ-JP:38368] (2 of 2) [CW-25115/2018] With regard to payment of amount of encashment of unutilised privilege leave, learned counsels for the respective parties agree that the petitioner is entitled for encashment of eight days privilege leave out of thirteen days claimed by him. Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to ensure payment of interest on delayed payment as also the amount of aforesaid eight days unutilised privilege leave within a period of four weeks from today failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to a cost of Rs.250/- per day delay and the officer(s) responsible for delay would bear the cost component. The writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /130