Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35114 (KAR)

SIDDALINGAPPA N v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY (BESCOM)

WP/33308/2024 · 2025-01-31

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4455 WP No. 33308 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 33308 OF 2024 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SIDDALINGAPPA N, SON OF NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT 171, KUDUREGERE ALUR, BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU - 562 213. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY (BESCOM), A GOVERNMENT COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001, E-MAIL MD@BESCOM.CO.IN, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MANAGING. 2. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP), N.R SQUARE, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 002, COMM@BBMP.GOV.IN, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER. 3. RAMANNA, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR - RAMESH ELECTRICALS 4TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHOKKASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NARASI REDDY, ADV. FOR SMT THARANGINI M.S, ADVOCATE FOR R1, SMT SINCHANA M R, ADV. FOR R2) Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4455 WP No. 33308 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF THE R-1 COMPANY BESCOM AND R-2 BBMP AND UPON PERUSAL OF THE SAME BE PLEASED TO DIRECT AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED LETTER BEARING NO. SA.KA.NI.IM(VI)/PI.N5UU.VI/SA.IM(TAM)/2024-25/3231 (ANNX -A) ISSUED BY BESCOM, DATED 18.10.2024. CONSEQUENTLY, DIRECT AND DIRECT THE R-1 TO PROVIDE THE PETITIONER WITH THE POWER SUPPLY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Memo is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. 2. In the memo it is stated that petitioner is claiming only LT2(a) installation. 3. Learned counsel for the 1st respondent submits that the petitioner is having LT2(a) installation. 4. Placing the Memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT:VN