SATISH NAYAK S/O SHRI MANOJ KUMAR NAYAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19409/2024 · 2025-02-04
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35107 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35107 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4865] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19409/2024 Satish Nayak S/o Shri Manoj Kumar Nayak, R/o Plot No. A 65, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Industry, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Managing Director, Rural Non-Farm Development Agency, 3Rd Floor, B-Block,yojna Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Jaipur 300205 Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Naina Saraf For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 04/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a Class IV employee. It is further submitted that petitioner is neither given/paid minimum pay scale nor regularized ever since the year 2012. It is further submitted that petitioner has filed a various representations qua the same however, the respondents have not considered the same. Additionally, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a limited prayer that the instant petition can be disposed of with a liberty to file a representation before the concerned authorities and respondents be directed to consider the same within a stipulated period. Heard.
[2025:RJ-JP:4865] (2 of 2) [CW-19409/2024] Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court directs the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously in light of the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and Circular dated
19.02.2024. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. It is made clear that non-compliance of the above-said order will not only compel this court to pass appropriate costs against the concerned Officer or initiate appropriate proceedings.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /362