1 2025:CGHC:35249 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 105 of 2025 M/s Chhattisgarh Sales Corporation, Address- Darri Road, Korba, (Chhattisgarh) Through Its Partner Bhagwan Das Agrawal Aged About 65 Years S/o Late Chhotelal Agrawal, R/o Chhattisgarh Sales Corporation, Ward No.2, Darri Road, Korba District- Korba, Chhattisgarh, Pin-495677 ... Petitioner. versus 1 - Initiating Officer Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Dctt), (Bpu-Raipur), Room No. 201, Second Floor, C.R. Building (Investigation Wing), Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G) 492001 2 - Adjudicating Authority Prohibition Of Benami Property Transactions Act 1988 B Wing, 9th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi- 110003 3 - Shri Jogi Ram Sahu S/o Mangtu Ram Sahu, Address 365 Ward No. 11, Kamta Chowk, Krishaknagar, Dharampura, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 492001 4 - Shri Vijay Jain Address D- 11, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : For respective Respondents : SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 23.07.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India and prayed for the following reliefs:- Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=CHATTISGARH, c=IN Date: 2025.07.23 17:13:42 +0530 2 10.1 Quashing/setting-aside Annexure-P-1 i.e. order dated 21.04.2025 passed by the Tribunal to the extent it observes "the appellant has tried to put certain documents going contrary to the pleadings" or expunging the observation i.e. "the appellant has tried to put certain documents going contrary to the pleadings" from the order dated 21.04.2025. 10.2 Grant any other relief(s) and/or pass any such order(s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in facts and circumstances of the case." 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has already been fixed for final hearing on 24.07.2025 before the Tribunal. He has only apprehension that certain documents which have been filed during the proceedings and observations made in this regard may effect the defence of the petitioner. However, at this juncture, the petitioner is seeking permission to withdraw this petition and also seeking liberty to raise all relevant grounds before the competent Authority at the time of final hearing. 3. Counsel for the respondent would not oppose the aforesaid limited prayer with regard withdrawal of the petition. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, prayer of withdrawal of the petition is allowed. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay