Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35107 (AP)

P.KOTESWARA RAO v. THE GOVT OF AP, REP.BY ASST.COMMISSIONER, AND ANOTHER

CMA/495/2012 · 2025-09-03

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010552382012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 495/2012 Between: 1. P.KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE RAGHAVULU, EASTERN STREET, NEAR SANTHANA VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, ELURU, W.G.DIST. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE GOVT OF AP REP BY ASST COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER, REP.BY THE ASST. COMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 2. SRI SANTHANA VENUGOPALA DEVASTHANAM, REP.BY ITS MANAGER, EASTERNSTREET, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 1000 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to maintain Status-Quo of the possession of the Petitioner in the building in D.No. 7A-1, in an extent of 160 Sq. yards, situated at Eastern Street, Eluru, West Godavari District, by receiving the rent from the petitioner, pending disposal of this CMA IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1618 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in CMAMP.no.1000 of 2012 in CMA.No. 495 of 2012 dt. 29/06/2012 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS 2. V VENUGOPALA RAO 3. E SAMBASIVA PRATAP The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.09.2025 KAS