PATAN (SHAIK BAJI KHAN) AND 5 OTHERS v. CH. ADINARAYANA AND 3 OTHERS
MACMA/3475/2012 · 2025-08-21
A Hari Haranadha Sarma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35106 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35106 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010551242012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3475/2012 Between:
1. PATAN (SHAIK BAJI KHAN) AND 5 OTHERS, S/O. KASIM KHAN, R/O.
H.NO. 12-6-1714/2, ASMANGADH, HYDERABAD.
2. PATAN (SHAIK) RAHEEMUNNISA BEGUM,, W/O. BAJI KHAN, R/O.
H.NO. 12-6-1714/2, ASMANGADH, HYDERABAD.
3. PATAN (SHAIK) BHOLI KHAN WALI,, S/O. BAJI KHAN, R/O. H.NO. 12- 6-1714/2, ASMANGADH, HYDERABAD.
4. PATAN (SHAIK) MASTAN KHAN,, S/O. BAJI KHAN, R/O. H.NO. 12-6- 1714/2, ASMANGADH, HYDERABAD.
5. PATAN (SHAIK) CHAND PASHA KHAN,, S/O. BAJI KHAN, R/O. H.NO.
12-6-1714/2, ASMANGADH, HYDERABAD.
6. SHAIK CHAND BEGUM,, W/O. SHAIK JANI R/O. H.NO. 12-6-1714/2, ASMANGADH, HYDERABAD.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. CH ADINARAYANA AND 3 OTHERS, S/O. KESAVULU OWNER OF LORRY BEARING NO. AP 20 T 4577 R/O. SATTUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KHAMMAM DISTRICT.
2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER DO 1 3RD FLOOR, ALKARIM TRADE CENTRE, RANIGUNJ,
AHHS,J
MAMCA NO.3475 OF 2012
3. SRI S V SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. NARSI REDDY SRINIVASA AGENCIES HPCL DEALER KASIMKOTA, ANKAPALLI,
4. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER RAMACHANDRA COMPLEX, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2009(MACMAMP 5594 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 9 days in preferring the MACMA IA NO: 1 OF 2012(MACMAMP 2302 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NASARAIAH GOLLA
2. . The Court made the following:
AHHS,J
MAMCA NO.3475 OF 2012
JUDGMENT:-
On 27.06.2025, there was no representation on both sides, and the matter was posted on 18.07.2025.
2. On 18.07.2025, there was no representation, and the matter was adjourned observing that “for appropriate orders on default basis” will be passed giving a specific date i.e., on 01.08.2025.
2. On 01.08.2025, there was no representation, and the matter was ordered to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” and was posted on
22.08.2025.
3. Even today also, there was no representation for the appellant and the conduct of the appellant indicating that they are not intend to prosecute the present appeal.
4. Accordingly, the MACMA is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim
order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA,J
Date: 22.08.2025 LSP
AHHS,J
MAMCA NO.3475 OF 2012
230
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3475/2012
Date: 22.08.2025 LSP