1 2025:CGHC:35920 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7922 of 2025 1 - Satya Prakash Rathore S/o Babulal Rathore, Aged About 45 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Thusekela Block Kharsia, Kharsia District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office, Mantralaya, P.S. Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Public Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Divisional Joint Director, Public Instruction Division, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer, Kharsia District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Revati Patel, Working As Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Thusekela Block Kharsia, Kharsia District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.24 19:00:13 +0530 2 24/07/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged his transfer order dated 30.06.2025, whereby the petitioner, who is Assistant Teacher (LB), was transferred from Govt. Primary School, Thusekela, Block Kharsia to Govt. Primary School, Sarsamar, Block Dharamjaigarh under the Rationalization Instructions dated 02.08.2024. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that, the representation of the petitioner is considered and the impugned order dated 03.06.2025 has been cancelled by the respondent No. 4 vide order dated 23.07.2025. He also placed a copy of the order dated 23.07.2025, which is being taken on record. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the impugned transfer order has already been cancelled, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the present petition further, as his grievances have already been redressed. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of at this stage. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved