1 2025:CGHC:38638-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 570 of 2025 Royal Travels Through Its Partner Sayyad Anwar Ali, Aged About 57 Years, S/o Sayyad Ahmed Ali, Intek Well Marg, Bhatagaon, Raipur Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Regional Transport Authority Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ghadi Chowk Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Jasviner Singh Sawhney, S/o Late Shri Harjinder Sawhney, Aged About 54 Years R/o Dubey Travels, H.No.- 07, Virdi Colony Kota, Near Saraswati Nagar Railway Station, Raipur Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ...Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Bharat Lal Dembra, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.08.05 18:15:55 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 05 .08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Bharat Lal Dembra, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State; and Mr. J.K. Gupta, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 3, on I.A. No. 1 of 2025, which is an application for condonation of delay. 2. Considering the grounds mentioned in I.A. No. 1 of 2025, the application is allowed. Delay of 17 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 3. The present intra-court appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 09.05.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPC No. 2435 of 2025 (Jasvinder Singh Sawhney vs. Regional Transport Authority & Others), whereby the writ petition filed by respondent No. 3/writ petitioner was disposed off at the motion stage. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he had filed a caveat and was arrayed as respondent No. 2 in WPC No. 2435 of 2025. However, the said writ petition was disposed off without affording him an opportunity of hearing. He, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the present writ appeal with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy before the learned Single Judge. 3 5. In view of the above, the present writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan