1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7915 of 2025 1 - Rakesh Singh Gond Son Of Buthawar Singh Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Bhalni Pali, Block Kharsiya District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Poornima Sidar D/o Of Jagdev Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt Primary School Awaspara Jajang Block Sakti District Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Banshi Lal Uranv Son Of Bund Ram Uranv Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher And Posted At Indira Awas Devermall Block Sakti District Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Panchayat And Social Welfare Department Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.16 17:23:23 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Badgaiya, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 16/07/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that 3 the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok