Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35090 (RAJ)

JAGDISH SON OF KANHAIYA LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16071/2024 · 2025-01-07

Anil Kumar Upman

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:952] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16071/2024 1. Jagdish Son Of Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Chachorni, Police Station Kamkhera, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar) 2. Mangilal Son Of Devi Shankar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Chachorni, Police Station Kamkhera, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar) 3. Omprakash Son Of Mannalal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Chachorni, Police Station Kamkhera, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar) 4. Kanhaiya Lal Son Of Mannalal, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Chachorni, Police Station Kamkhera, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Special P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/01/2025 After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of this bail application with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after recording the testimony of Seizure Officer. [2025:RJ-JP:952] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16071/2024] Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Learned trial court is directed to record the testimony of Seizure Officer on priority basis. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J GAUTAM JAIN /354