Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3509 (GAU)

Tata Motors Limited v. The State of AP and 3 Ors

WP(C)/215/2025 · 2026-06-22

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040007562025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/215/2025 Tata Motors Limited represented by Shri Tuhin Chatterjee, having its office at 4th Floor, Ahura Center, 82, Mahakali, 82, Mahakali, Caves Road, MIDC, Andheri (East) Mumbai 400093 VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:Dulley Pai Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Dulley Tadu resident of Village Michi Ziro PO and PS Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Glorious Motors Pvt Ltd Age: 0 Occupation : Having its registered office at Pattan No.122 and 124 NH 52 Kamalabaria Haitlung Roanapur North Lakhimpur 787031 4:Tarh Motors LLP Age: 0 Occupation : having its registered office near Inter State Truck Terminalm Lekhi Village Page No.# 2/2 Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : H K Jamoh, Eddie Payeng Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Tai Dool,Sumit Chhetri BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 23-06-2026 Mr. M. Ete, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H. K. Jamoh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. P. Pangu, learned Government Advocate for respondent No. 1, and Mr. S. Chetri, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, are present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed, as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant