Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35075 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. PRINCIPAL D.A.V. COLLEGE AMBALA CITY AND ANR

CR/1613/2025 · 2025-07-03

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-9218-CII-2025 in/and CR-1613-2025 (O&M) [1] 125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-9218-CII-2025 in/and CR-1613-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.07.2025 Bhupinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Principal DAV College, Ambala City and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) CM-9218-CII-2025 1. This is an application for restoration of the case and recalling of order dated 19.03.2025. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, the present application is allowed and order dated 19.03.2025 is recalled and the main case is restored to its original number. Main case 1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 15.12.2022 passed by the Rent Controller, vide which the application for ejectment filed by the respondents from the premises in question had been allowed and the petitioner was directed to vacate the premises within two months from the date of the said order. Challenge is also to the PAWAN KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CM-9218-CII-2025 in/and CR-1613-2025 (O&M) [2] judgment dated 16.12.2024 vide which the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Appellate Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, on instructions from his clients, has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to another premises. It has been stated that the petitioner is a tenant in the premises for the last more than 19 years. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with the following observations/directions:- i) The petitioner would be permitted to occupy the premises till 31.01.2026, subject to the conditions mentioned hereinafter and would vacate the premises and hand over the keys of the premises to the respondents on or before 31.01.2026. ii) The petitioner would pay an amount of Rs.3000/- per month from the month of July, 2025 up to the period the petitioner stays in occupation, on or before 22nd of every month. iii) The petitioner would pay the arrears of rent, if any, within a period of two months from today. iv) The petitioner would file an undertaking on the said three aspects before the Executing Court within a period of three weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the landlord in the Executing Court. 4. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not submit the PAWAN KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CM-9218-CII-2025 in/and CR-1613-2025 (O&M) [3] said undertaking or does not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions then it would be open to the respondents to seek immediate possession of the premises in question from the petitioner by applying for police help in addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt of Courts Act. 5. In view of what has been observed above, the present revision petition is disposed of. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of in view of the abovesaid order. 03.07.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.07.03 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document