n I.. KN V APHC010552732011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2782 OF 2011 Between: Ramavath Dakya Naik, S/o. Hanuma Naik, Aged about 33 years, NREGS Field Assistant, MPDO Office Venkatampalli Village, H/o. Chinna Tanda, Vajrakarur Mandal, Uravakonda Taluk, Anantapur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2. The Project Director, District Water Management Corporation, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Vajrakaroor Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. The Joint Secretary, Center for Development Studies, A.P. ARD AMR - AP ARD Campus, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3"'^ respondent in not permitting the petitioner to continue as a Field Assistant in the office of the 3'"^ respondent without there, being any show cause notice, or termination orders - illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as a Field Assistant in 3'^ respondent office. IS IA NO: 1 OF 2011fWPMP 3434 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3^^ respondent to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant in the 3 respondent office pending disposal of the main writ petition. rd Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI P. SAI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 &2:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M. SUDHIR, SC FOR ZPP, MPP & GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M. BALASUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following order: APHC010552732011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3330] nc PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2782/2011 Between; 1 RAMAVATH DAKYA NAIK, S/0. HANUMA NAIK NREGS FIELD ASSISTANT MPDO OFFICE VENKATAMPALLI VILLAGE, H/O. CHINNA TANDA, VAJRAKARUR MANDAL, URAVAKONDA TALUK, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.DIST COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3.THE MANDAL PARISHAD VAJRAKAROOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4.THE JOINT SECRETARY, CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, A.P. ARD AMR RAJEND RAN AGAR, HYDERABAD. DISTRICT WATER DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AP ARD CAMPUS, ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not permitting the petitioner to continue as a Field Assistant in the office of the 3rd respondent without there, being any show cause notice, or termination orders is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as a Field Assistant in 3rd respondent office. lA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP3434 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant in the 3rd respondent office pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.P SAI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) 2.M BALASU BRAHMANYAM 3.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following; THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 2782 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs, sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any. As a shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS assistant REGISTRY //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri P. Sai Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 2. one CC to Sri M. Sudhir, SC for ZPP, MPP & Gram PanchayatlOPUC] 3. One CC to Sri M. Balasubrahmanyam 4. Two CCS to GP for Panchayat Raj Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Tnatc) CD Copies , Advocate [OPUC] i & Rural Development, High Court of ssb HIGH COURT DATED;04/07/2025 ORDER WP No.2782 OF 2011 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS